Microplastics and Human Health: How to Reduce Exposure and Support the Body’s Natural Detoxification Systems

Introduction

Microplastics have moved from oceans and environmental research into human medicine. Researchers now detect plastic particles in the food we eat, the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the dust inside our homes.(1,2)

Recent evidence also indicates that some particles can cross biological barriers and enter human tissues. Micro- and nanoplastics have been identified in human lungs, blood vessels, and atherosclerotic plaques. However, detection alone does not prove that the particles caused a specific disease.(1,14)

The scientific picture remains incomplete, but the direction is clear: continuous exposure deserves attention.

There is, though, no reason to view microplastics through fear. Exposure is widespread, yet many of its largest sources are modifiable. The most rational approach combines source reduction, healthy barrier function, regular bowel function, good respiratory health, and adequate antioxidant capacity.

What are microplastics and nanoplastics?

Microplastics are solid plastic particles smaller than five millimeters. They include visible fragments, microscopic fibers, particles released from consumer products, and fragments produced when larger plastic materials break down.(1,2)

Nanoplastics are smaller particles within the submicrometre or nanometre range. Scientific definitions vary, but nanoplastics are generally small enough to interact more readily with cells and biological membranes than larger particles.(1,5)

Plastic particles can be divided into two main categories:

Primary microplastics are intentionally manufactured at a small size. They may occur in industrial abrasives, coatings, cosmetics, paints, and some personal care products.(8)
Secondary microplastics form when larger plastic products degrade through ultraviolet radiation, mechanical wear, heat, washing, weathering, or chemical breakdown.(2,6)

Particle size is important. Larger particles usually remain within the gastrointestinal tract and are excreted in the stool. Smaller microplastics and nanoplastics may have a greater capacity to interact with the intestinal lining, respiratory epithelium, immune cells, and other tissues.(1,15)

Particle shape also matters. Fibers, fragments, spheres, and irregular particles may behave differently. The polymer type, surface charge, chemical additives, and contaminants attached to the particle can also influence biological effects.(1,10)

Microplastics are part of the modern exposome

The exposome describes the total environmental exposure that a person encounters throughout life. It includes air pollution, food contaminants, household chemicals, medications, occupational exposures, lifestyle factors, stress, and biological responses.

Microplastics form one part of this total load.(25)

A single exposure rarely determines health. The more relevant question concerns repeated exposure from several sources over months, years, and decades. Food packaging, drinking water, indoor dust, synthetic clothing, kitchen utensils, cosmetics, vehicle tires, and airborne particles can create a continuous background exposure.(2,7,9)

The biological response also differs between people. Age, genetics, nutritional status, respiratory health, intestinal barrier function, microbiome composition, kidney function, liver function, inflammation, and existing disease may influence the body's response.

This explains why exposure level alone cannot define individual risk.(26,27)

The main exposure routes

Humans encounter microplastics through three possible routes:

Ingestion through food and drinking water
Inhalation through indoor and outdoor air
Contact with the skin

Ingestion and inhalation currently represent the most established routes. Dermal exposure is an active area of research, but intact skin likely limits the absorption of many larger particles. Damaged skin, hair follicles, very small particles, and prolonged contact may alter this barrier.(1,2)

1. Food and drinking water

Researchers have found microplastics in drinking water, seafood, salt, processed foods, beverages, and other food products. The measured amounts vary widely because sampling and analytical techniques remain inconsistent.(1,2)

Food can become contaminated during production, processing, transport, preparation, packaging, and storage. Plastic particles can also originate from the surrounding air and dust.(2,7)

Water represents another continuous source. Microplastics occur in both tap water and bottled water. Bottled water can gain additional particles from the bottle, cap, production process, transport, and repeated mechanical handling.(2,5)

Improved analytical methods have increased the number of particles that researchers can identify. In 2024, Qian and colleagues used stimulated Raman scattering microscopy to analyze bottled water. They detected approximately 110,000–370,000 plastic particles per liter in the samples studied, with around 90 percent classified as nanoplastics.(5)

The particle count alone does not determine toxicity. Size, polymer, surface chemistry, dose, and biological availability remain important. Still, bottled water should not automatically be considered cleaner than properly treated tap water.(1,2,5)

2. Plastic food containers and heat

Plastic food containers can release micro- and nanoplastics during normal use. Heat, abrasion, ultraviolet radiation, repeated washing, aging, and prolonged food contact can increase particle release.

Hussain and colleagues studied plastic containers and reusable food pouches. They found that microwave heating and other forms of use could release substantial numbers of micro- and nanoplastic particles.(3)

The practical principle is simple:

Avoid heating food or drinks in plastic whenever possible.

The label “microwave-safe” usually means that the container should retain its physical structure under specified conditions. It does not guarantee that the material releases no particles or chemical compounds.(3)

Hot, acidic, oily, and salty foods can increase migration from food-contact materials. Long storage times can add further contact.(2,3)

Glass, stainless steel, and high-quality ceramic offer better options for hot food and drinks.

3. Disposable cups and takeaway packaging

Disposable paper cups often contain a thin plastic lining that prevents leakage. Hot water can release microplastic particles and other compounds from this internal layer.(4)

Ranjan and colleagues found that disposable paper cups released microplastics and chemical substances into hot water. Temperature and contact time increased the release.

Frequent takeaway coffee can therefore represent a source of repeated exposure. The same concern applies to plastic lids, coated food boxes, plastic cutlery, and hot food placed directly into disposable plastic packaging.(2,4)

Occasional exposure is unlikely to affect health. Daily repetition deserves more attention.

A reusable stainless-steel, glass or ceramic cup reduces direct contact between hot liquids and disposable plastic coatings.

4. Indoor air and household dust

Indoor air is an important and often underestimated source of microplastic exposure. People spend a large proportion of their lives indoors, where particles accumulate from textiles, furniture, flooring, coatings, electronics and household products.(7,9,28)

Household dust can contain plastic fragments, synthetic fibers, and chemical additives released from plastic materials. These particles may enter the body through inhalation, hand-to-mouth contact and swallowing after mucociliary transport from the respiratory tract.(7,9)

Common indoor sources include:

Synthetic clothing
Carpets and rugs
Upholstered furniture
Curtains
Mattresses and bedding
Plastic flooring
Paints and coatings
Electronics
Packaging materials
Household objects

Normal movement, ventilation, vacuuming, textile abrasion and tumble-drying can return settled particles to the air.(6,7,9)

Household dust may also carry plasticisers, flame retardants and other additives. A microplastic particle can therefore act as both a physical particle and a carrier of chemical exposure.(7)

Children may receive a greater exposure in relation to body weight because they spend more time near the floor and have more frequent hand-to-mouth contact.(7,28)

5. Synthetic textiles

Polyester, acrylic, polyamide, elastane, and other synthetic fibers release microscopic fragments during use, washing, tumble-drying, and aging.(6)

Textiles contribute to water pollution through laundry wastewater, but they also affect indoor air. Clothing, blankets, carpets, and upholstered furniture continuously release fibers into dust.(6,7,9)

Tumble-drying can create a particularly high airborne fiber load. Washing filters and external microfibre-capture devices can reduce fiber release into wastewater. Natural fibers can reduce exposure to plastic fibers, although natural textiles also produce non-plastic dust and may contain dyes or finishing chemicals.(6)

The aim does not need to be the complete elimination of synthetic materials. Focus first on frequently used items that remain close to the skin or face, such as bedding, underwear, exercise clothing, and blankets.

6. Cosmetics and personal care products

Some cosmetics and personal care products contain intentionally added microplastic particles or synthetic polymers. These substances can act as exfoliants, stabilisers, film-forming agents, texture modifiers or delivery systems.(8)

Rinse-off products contribute particles to wastewater, while leave-on products create prolonged skin contact. The presence of a synthetic polymer does not always mean that a product contains solid microplastic particles, but products with visible plastic exfoliating beads remain an avoidable source.

Reducing unnecessary personal care products and selecting simpler formulations can also reduce exposure to fragrances, preservatives and other associated chemicals.

What happens after particles enter the body?

Most larger ingested microplastics appear to pass through the gastrointestinal tract and leave through the stool. This makes fecal elimination a central physiological route.

The smallest particles may behave differently.(15)

Experimental models indicate that some microplastics and nanoplastics can interact with the intestinal epithelium, mucus layer, immune cells, and tight junctions between cells. Very small particles may cross tissue barriers through cellular uptake, paracellular transport, immune-cell transport, or specialized intestinal structures.(1,10)

The fraction that crosses into the body probably depends on:

Particle size
Shape
Polymer type
Surface chemistry
Dose
Food matrix
Intestinal health
Mucus integrity
Inflammatory state
Microbiome composition

The exact absorption rate of different microplastics and nanoplastics in humans has not been established.(1,15)

Inhaled particles face several defense mechanisms. Nasal filtration traps many larger particles. Mucus and cilia transport particles upward from the airways, after which they are coughed out or swallowed. Alveolar macrophages remove some particles that reach the deeper regions of the lungs.(18)

These systems do not remove every inhaled particle. Continuous exposure, respiratory inflammation and impaired ciliary function may reduce clearance efficiency.(9,18)

How could microplastics affect human biology?

Human outcome data remain limited. Much of the mechanistic evidence comes from cell studies and animal models. These models cannot directly define human risk, but they identify biologically plausible pathways.

Oxidative stress

Microplastics can increase reactive oxygen species production in experimental systems. Excess oxidative activity can damage cellular lipids, proteins, DNA, and mitochondrial structures.(10)

The response depends strongly on the particle. Small particles with reactive surfaces may create a different effect from large, inert fragments. Weathered particles may also behave differently from newly manufactured particles. (1,7,10)

Plastic additives and environmental pollutants adsorbed on the surface can increase the oxidative burden.

Inflammation

Particles can activate epithelial cells, macrophages, and other immune cells. This activation may increase levels of inflammatory signaling molecules, such as interleukins and tumor necrosis factor.(10)

A short inflammatory response supports defense and repair. Persistent exposure may sustain low-grade inflammatory signaling, especially when barriers are impaired or particles remain in tissue.

Inflammation and oxidative stress can reinforce each other. Oxidative damage activates immune pathways, while activated immune cells generate additional reactive molecules.

Barrier dysfunction

The intestinal, respiratory, and skin barriers separate internal tissues from the external environment.

Experimental evidence suggests that microplastics can alter mucus, tight-junction proteins, epithelial integrity, and local immune responses. A weakened barrier may increase contact between particles, chemicals, microbes, and underlying tissues.

Barrier dysfunction does not mean that the intestine becomes an unrestricted opening. It describes a change in the controlled regulation of substances that cross the epithelial layer.(11)

The intestinal microbiome

Animal and cellular studies suggest that microplastics can alter microbial diversity and the relative abundance of bacterial groups. Researchers have also observed changes in microbial metabolites, intestinal inflammation, and barrier function.(10,12)

The direction and clinical meaning of these changes remain uncertain in humans. Diet, medications, sleep, stress, infections, and numerous environmental chemicals also influence the microbiome.

Microplastics should therefore be viewed as one possible modifier within a larger system.

Mitochondrial stress

Mitochondria generate cellular energy and regulate redox balance, inflammation, calcium signaling, and programmed cell death.

Environmental particles and associated chemicals may disturb mitochondrial membrane function, increase oxidative damage, and reduce energy production. Cells with high energy requirements may be particularly sensitive to mitochondrial disruption.(10,13)

Current evidence does not show that normal everyday microplastic exposure causes a defined mitochondrial disease. It does show a plausible pathway through which high or persistent exposure could add to cellular stress.(13)

Plastic additives and attached chemicals

Plastic particles do not consist only of the basic polymer.

Products can contain plasticizers, pigments, stabilizers, flame retardants, ultraviolet protectors, processing aids, metals, and other additives. Some of these substances can migrate out of the material.(7)

Particle surfaces can also bind chemicals from the surrounding environment. This creates a combined exposure involving the physical particle, its original additives, and substances acquired later. The toxicological effect may therefore differ between particles that look similar under a microscope.(1,7)

Microplastics in atherosclerotic plaques

One of the most important human studies was published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2024.(14)

Marfella and colleagues analyzed carotid artery plaques removed from 257 patients undergoing endarterectomy. Researchers identified polyethylene in the plaques of 58.4 percent of patients and polyvinyl chloride in 12.1 percent of patients. They also observed particles within macrophages in the plaque tissue.

During an average follow-up of 33.7 months, the combined outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause occurred in:

20.0 percent of patients whose plaques contained micro- or nanoplastics
7.5 percent of patients whose plaques did not contain detectable particles

Plaques containing plastic particles also showed greater inflammatory activity, including higher levels of IL-18, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.

This study provides an important human signal, but it does not prove causation.

Patients with higher plastic exposure may also differ in diet, occupation, socioeconomic factors, air pollution exposure, smoking, or other cardiovascular risk factors. Diseased plaques may more readily capture circulating particles. Detection methods and contamination control also remain important technical concerns.

The correct conclusion is that micro- and nanoplastics in vascular plaques were associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular events. Further research must determine whether the particles directly promote plaque inflammation and instability.

What science still needs to clarify

Analytical methods differ

Studies use different collection methods, size limits, filters, chemical identification techniques, and contamination controls. A method that detects particles larger than 20 micrometers will yield a very different result from one that detects nanoplastics.(1,2,5)

Particle counts do not describe the full dose

Ten large particles and ten thousand nanoplastics do not represent the same biological exposure. Researchers may report particle number, mass, surface area, polymer concentration, or fluorescence. These values cannot always be compared.(1,5)

Contamination is difficult to prevent

Plastic laboratory equipment, synthetic clothing, airborne fibers, filters, and sample containers can contaminate samples. High-quality studies require strict blank controls and polymer confirmation.(1,2)

Exposure does not equal disease.

The presence of a particle does not prove that it caused tissue damage. Human research needs prospective studies, validated biomarkers, repeated exposure measurements, and clinically relevant outcomes.(1,14)

Real-world particles differ from laboratory particles

Many experiments use uniform polystyrene spheres at concentrations that may exceed typical human exposure levels. Real particles have irregular shapes, varied polymers, environmental weathering, chemical coatings, and broad size distributions.(1,10)

These limitations do not remove the concern. They define the degree of certainty.

The most effective ways to reduce microplastic exposure

The goal is not to eliminate all contact with plastic, simply because it is currently unrealistic. The goal is to reduce high-frequency exposure from the most controllable sources.

1. Stop heating food in plastic

Transfer food to glass or ceramic before using a microwave. Avoid pouring boiling liquids into plastic containers. Do not place very hot, oily, or acidic foods directly into soft plastic. Replace badly scratched or degraded plastic containers.(3)

2. Use glass, stainless steel, or ceramic for hot food and drinks

Prioritize these materials for coffee, tea, soup, leftovers, cooking oils, and long-term food storage. This change reduces both particle release and chemical migration.(2,3)

3. Reduce routine bottled-water consumption

Use tested tap water where local water quality is good. Store drinking water in glass or stainless steel.(2,5)

A suitable water filter may reduce particles and other contaminants, but filter performance depends on pore size, technology, maintenance, and water chemistry.
Reverse osmosis and high-quality membrane systems can remove very small particles more effectively than simple carbon filters. Carbon filtration can still improve taste and reduce the levels of several chemicals.
Replace filters according to the manufacturer’s schedule. A neglected filter can lose performance or support microbial growth.

4. Reduce hot takeaway drinks and food

Carry a reusable stainless-steel or glass cup. Ask restaurants to place food in your own suitable container, where local rules allow. The highest priority concerns hot liquids and hot, fatty foods.(4)

5. Control household dust

Use a vacuum cleaner with a sealed HEPA filtration system. Wipe surfaces with a damp cloth rather than moving dry dust into the air.(7,9)

Pay attention to bedrooms, carpets, upholstered furniture, ventilation inlets, electronics, and areas under beds.

Wash hands before eating, especially after cleaning or handling dusty materials.

6. Improve indoor-air management

Maintain effective ventilation. Use a properly sized HEPA air purifier in rooms with high particle loads, heavy textile use, poor outdoor air, or limited ventilation.(9)

HEPA filtration captures airborne particles. It does not remove gaseous volatile organic compounds unless the device also contains enough suitable activated carbon or another adsorbent.

7. Review synthetic textiles

Prioritize natural fibers for bedding and frequently used clothes where practical. Reduce unnecessary tumble-drying of synthetic textiles.(6)
Wash synthetic garments only when needed, use full loads, select gentler cycles, and consider a laundry microfibre filter or capture bag.
Replace heavily shedding textiles.

8. Simplify personal care products

Avoid cosmetic products with visible plastic microbeads. Reduce the number of unnecessary leave-on and rinse-off products. A simpler formulation also reduces exposure to fragrances, preservatives, and other non-plastic chemicals.(8)

Can the body eliminate microplastics?

The body has several particle-clearance systems, but no clinically validated treatment can remove all accumulated microplastics from human tissues.

Stool is the main route for ingested particles

Most swallowed particles remain in the gastrointestinal tract and are excreted in the stool. Regular bowel movements, therefore, support the primary physiological elimination pathway.(15)

Adequate fluid, dietary fiber, physical activity, and normal intestinal motility support this process. These actions do not “detoxify” plastic already embedded in tissue. They help prevent unnecessary retention within the intestinal contents.

Useful fiber sources include:

Vegetables
Berries
Legumes
Oats
Psyllium
Seeds
Nuts
Whole grains, when tolerated

Increase fiber gradually and drink enough water.

Respiratory clearance removes part of the inhaled load

The nasal passages, mucus, cilia, cough reflex, and macrophages remove many inhaled particles.(18)

Smoking, chronic airway inflammation, dehydration, respiratory infections, and impaired ciliary function can weaken clearance. Reducing inhaled exposure remains more reliable than trying to accelerate clearance after exposure.

Chitosan: early evidence for microplastic removal

Chitosan is a positively charged polysaccharide that can bind some negatively charged particle surfaces.

A 2025 study by Liu and Shimizu reported that ingested chitosan increased microplastic excretion. The research included preclinical evidence and preliminary human findings, but the evidence remains too early to support a standard medical protocol.(16)

Chitosan can also bind fats, bile acids, medications, and nutrients. People with shellfish allergies, gastrointestinal conditions, or regular medication use should not treat it as a harmless universal binder.

Specific probiotics: promising preclinical research

Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DT66 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DT88 have shown an ability to adsorb microplastics and increase fecal excretion in experimental models.(17)

These findings do not mean that common probiotic products remove microplastics. The effect appears strain-specific, and human clinical evidence remains insufficient.

Marketing claims should not precede the research.

Nutrition can support resilience, but it does not dissolve plastic

No food or supplement has been shown to reliably remove microplastics from human tissues.

Nutrition can still support systems that respond to particle exposure:(19)

Intestinal barrier integrity
Regular bowel function
Mucus production
Glutathione synthesis
Antioxidant enzymes
Mitochondrial function
Immune regulation
Phase I and phase II biotransformation of associated chemicals

Sufficient protein supplies glycine, cysteine, and glutamate for glutathione synthesis. Cruciferous vegetables provide glucosinolates that form isothiocyanates such as sulforaphane. Sulforaphane activates Nrf2-regulated cellular defense pathways.(19,20)

N-acetylcysteine provides cysteine for glutathione synthesis. Clinical evidence supports its ability to improve glutathione availability in situations associated with cysteine deficiency or increased oxidative stress. Its use and dose should still reflect individual need.(20)

Glycine and N-acetylcysteine used together as GlyNAC improved glutathione deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, and several inflammatory markers in a randomized trial involving older adults. The result cannot be directly interpreted as proof of microplastic removal.(21)

A six-month randomized controlled trial found that oral glutathione increased glutathione concentrations in several body compartments and altered certain immune markers. It did not examine microplastic elimination.(22)

Cruciferous vegetables contain glucosinolates that form isothiocyanates such as sulforaphane. Sulforaphane activates Nrf2-regulated antioxidant and phase II defense pathways.(23)

In a randomized clinical trial, a broccoli-sprout beverage increased urinary excretion of metabolites associated with the detoxification of benzene and acrolein. This supports the use of cruciferous vegetables for general environmental defense, but it does not prove that they remove microplastic particles.(24)

Sauna and sweating

Sweat may contain some plastic-associated chemicals, including bisphenol A. This indicates that sweating can contribute to the excretion of selected chemicals. It does not establish sweating as a route of elimination for solid microplastic particles.(30)

Sauna increases body temperature, circulation and sweating and can act as a controlled heat stressor. Current evidence does not show that sauna removes microplastics from human tissues.(31)

Sauna should therefore be viewed as a general health and heat-adaptation intervention rather than solely a proven microplastic detoxification treatment.

A practical Hololife approach

The most effective strategy follows a clear order.

First, reduce the source. Stop heating food in plastic, reduce bottled water, control household dust, and limit routine contact between hot food and disposable packaging.

Second, support physical barriers. Maintain respiratory health, intestinal health, sleep, adequate nutrition, and a diverse, fiber-rich diet.

Third, support normal elimination. Maintain regular bowel function, hydration, movement, and functional respiratory clearance.

Fourth, use supplements only for a defined reason. NAC, glycine, glutathione, fiber products, or experimental binders should not replace source reduction. Their use should reflect nutritional status, medical history, medications, and measurable need.

Fifth, avoid false precision. Commercial urine, blood, or stool tests for microplastics are not yet established as routine clinical tools. Test results may depend heavily on contamination control and laboratory methodology.

Take home message

Microplastics represent a real and growing environmental exposure. Humans encounter them through food, water, air, dust, packaging, textiles, and consumer products.

The strongest concerns involve the smallest particles, repeated exposure, particle-associated chemicals, oxidative stress, inflammation, barrier disruption, and possible entry into tissues. The discovery of micro- and nanoplastics in carotid plaques and their association with cardiovascular outcomes marks an important development in human research.

The evidence still contains major uncertainties. Science has not established the exact disease burden from normal, everyday exposure. It has also not established a supplement, binder, or detoxification protocol that removes microplastics from human tissues.

A rational response starts with the environment.

Replace plastic around hot food and drinks. Reduce bottled water. Control indoor dust. Improve air filtration. Review synthetic textiles. Maintain regular bowel function. Support antioxidant capacity through high-quality nutrition.

You do not need a 100% plastic-free life – you need to identify the exposures that recur daily, remove the largest ones first, and, step by step, build a plastic-reducing lifestyle that supports your overall health and well-being.

References

Sun A, Wang WX. Human exposure to microplastics and its associated health risks. Environment & Health. 2023;1(3):139–149.
Zuri G, Karanasiou A, Lacorte S. Microplastics: Human exposure assessment through air, water, and food. Environment International. 2023;179:108150.
Hussain KA, Romanova S, Okur I, Zhang D, Kuebler J, Huang X, et al. Assessing the release of microplastics and nanoplastics from plastic containers and reusable food pouches: Implications for human health. Environmental Science & Technology. 2023;57(26):9782–9792.
Ranjan VP, Joseph A, Goel S. Microplastics and other harmful substances released from disposable paper cups into hot water. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;404:124118.
Qian N, Gao X, Lang X, Deng H, Bratu TM, Chen Q, et al. Rapid single-particle chemical imaging of nanoplastics by SRS microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2024;121(3).
Periyasamy AP, Tehrani-Bagha A. A review on microplastic emission from textile materials and its reduction techniques. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2022;199:109901.
Salthammer T. Microplastics and their additives in the indoor environment. Angewandte Chemie. 2022;134(32).
Napper IE, Bakir A, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC. Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2015;99(1–2):178–185.
Kek HY, Tan H, Othman MHD, Nyakuma BB, Ho WS, Sheng DDCV, et al. Critical review on airborne microplastics: An indoor air contaminant of emerging concern. Environmental Research. 2024;245:118055.
Kadac-Czapska K, Ośko J, Knez E, Grembecka M. Microplastics and oxidative stress: Current problems and prospects. Antioxidants. 2024;13(5):579.
Sözener ZC, Cevhertas L, Nadeau K, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Environmental factors in epithelial barrier dysfunction. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020;145(6):1517–1528.
Singh S, Sharma P, Pal N, Kumawat M, Shubham S, Sarma DK, et al. Impact of environmental pollutants on gut microbiome and mental health via the gut–brain axis. Microorganisms. 2022;10(7):1457.
Reddam A, McLarnan S, Kupsco A. Environmental chemical exposures and mitochondrial dysfunction: A review of recent literature. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2022;9(4):631–649.
Marfella R, Prattichizzo F, Sardu C, et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine. 2024;390:900–910.
Sangkham S, Phairuang W, Sakunkoo P, Ta AT. A review on microplastics in mammalian feces: Monitoring techniques and associated challenges. Environmental Challenges. 2025;20:101217.
Liu D, Shimizu M. Ingesting chitosan can promote excretion of microplastics. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):14041.
Teng X, Zhang T, Rao C. Novel probiotics adsorbing and excreting microplastics in vivo show potential gut health benefits. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2025;15:1522794.
Möller W, Häußinger K, Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Heyder J. Mucociliary and long-term particle clearance in airways of patients with immotile cilia. Respiratory Research. 2006;7(1):10.
Hodges RE, Minich DM. Modulation of metabolic detoxification pathways using foods and food-derived components: A scientific review with clinical application. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2015;2015:760689.
Tenório MCDS, Graciliano NG, Moura FA, Oliveira ACM, Goulart MOF. N-acetylcysteine: Impacts on human health. Antioxidants. 2021;10(6):967.
Kumar P, et al. Supplementing glycine and N-acetylcysteine in older adults improves glutathione deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, physical function, and aging hallmarks: A randomized clinical trial. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2023;78(1):75–89.
Richie JP, Nichenametla S, Neidig W, Calcagnotto A, Haley JS, Schell TD, Muscat JE. Randomized controlled trial of oral glutathione supplementation on body stores of glutathione. European Journal of Nutrition. 2015;54(2):251–263.
Boddupalli S, Mein JR, Lakkanna S, James DR. Induction of phase 2 antioxidant enzymes by broccoli sulforaphane: Perspectives in maintaining the antioxidant activity of vitamins A, C, and E. Frontiers in Genetics. 2012;3:7.
Egner PA, et al. Rapid and sustainable detoxication of airborne pollutants by broccoli sprout beverage: Results of a randomized clinical trial in China. Cancer Prevention Research. 2014;7(8):813–823.
Lioy PJ, Rappaport SM. Exposure science and the exposome: An opportunity for coherence in the environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2011;119(11)–A467.
Sexton K, Hattis D. Assessing cumulative health risks from exposure to environmental mixtures: Three fundamental questions. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007;115(5):825–832.
Varshavsky JR, Rayasam SD, Sass JB, Axelrad DA, Cranor CF, Hattis D, et al. Current practice and recommendations for advancing how human variability and susceptibility are considered in chemical risk assessment. Environmental Health. 2023;21(Suppl 1):133.
Maung TZ, Bishop JE, Holt E, Turner AM, Pfrang C. Indoor air pollution and the health of vulnerable groups: A systematic review focused on particulate matter, volatile organic compounds and their effects on children and people with pre-existing lung disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(14):8752.
Lee PH, Park S, Lee YG, Choi SM, An MH, Jang AS. The impact of environmental pollutants on barrier dysfunction in respiratory disease. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research. 2021;13(6):850–862.
Genuis SJ, Beesoon S, Birkholz D, Lobo RA. Human excretion of bisphenol A: Blood, urine, and sweat study. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2012;2012:185731.
Laukkanen JA, Laukkanen T, Kunutsor SK. Cardiovascular and other health benefits of sauna bathing: A review of the evidence. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2018;93(8):1111–1121.